FORMATION OF FUTURE FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHERS’ READІNESS FOR ORGANIZATION OF COMMUNICATIVE PROCESS IN THEIR PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY
Abstract
The article substantiates the essence and identifies the main components of the communicative process. The conditions of communication have been specified. The essence of ways of collaboration with a communicative partner has been revealed, among which the following: cooperation, partnership, domination, manipulation, conflict are singled out. Communication is usually considered by scientists as a complex phenomenon and an important factor of influencing social processes. Verbal communication occurs as a purposeful process of creating, transmitting and interpreting messages by means of language (language code). It is this aspect of interpersonal interaction that is embodied in the communicative process, which has a complex dynamic nature, is a sociolinguistic complex, continuous interaction of communication participants. Emphasis has been placed on the feasibility of using interactive technologies in the preparation of future foreign language teachers, as the optimal learning environment for students to master the skills and abilities to organize an effective communication process. In the course of scientific intelligence, the principles of verbal interaction determine the principle of politeness, for instance mutual commitment of communicators, and the principle of cooperation – mutual operation of information. The way of dealing with a communicative partner is based on the canons of communicative behavior. Students have the opportunity to test the best examples of ways to deal with a communicative partner in the professional activities of future foreign language teachers by actively participating in interactive situations of professional orientation during higher education. The authors of the article generalize that the organization of the communicative process has a complex dynamic nature and is determined by the continuous interaction of communication participants.
Key words: future teachers; professional activity; communicative process; communication; communicators; interactive technologies.
Downloads
References
Андреева, Г. М. (2000). Общение как обмен информацией (коммуникативная сторона общения); Общение как взаимодействие (интерактивная сторона общения) / Г. М. Андреева (Ред.) Психология влияния. СПб.: Питер, 99–114.
Арутюнова, Н. Д. (2003). Предложение и его смысл: Логико-семантические проблемы. Москва. 383.
Батаршев, А. В. (2006). Диагностика способности к общению. Питер, 2006. 176.
Бацевич, Ф. С. (2002). Термінологія комунікативної лінгвістики: аспекти дискурсивного підходу. Вісник нац. ун-ту «Львівська політехніка». 12–19.
Биркенбиль, В. Ф. (2002). Коммуникационный тренинг: наука общения для всех. Москва. 352.
Почепцов, Г. Г. (2001). Теория коммуникации. Москва. 256.
Семенюк, О. А., Паращук В. Ю. (2010). Основи теорії мовної комунікації : навч. посіб. Київ: ВЦ «Академія». 240.
Котун, К. (2020). Законодавче забезпечення професійного розвитку вчителя в Україні. Вісник Кафедри ЮНЕСКО «Неперервна професійна освіта ХХІ століття», (2), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.35387/ucj.2(2).2020.13-17
Чорній В. Я. (2011). Формування готовності до професійного спілкування майбутніх фахівців фінансово-економічної сфери: дис. … канд. пед. наук : 13.00.04. Тернопіль. 324.
References (translated and transliterated)
Andreeva H. M. (2000). Obsluhovuvannya yak obmin informatsiyeyu (komunikatyvna storona suspilstva) [Communication as information exchange (communicative side of communication)]. Obshchenye kak vzaymodeystvye (ynteraktyvnaya storona obshchenyya) [Communication as interaction (interactive side of communication)]. Psikhologiya vliyaniya – The psychology of influence. SPb.: Pyter, 2000. 99–114 [in Russian].
Arutyunova N. D. (2003). Predlozhenye y eho smysl: Lohiko-semantychni problem [Sentence and its meaning: Logical and semantic problems]. 3-e yzd., Ster. M. : Edytoryal URSS, 2003. 383 [in Russian].
Batarshev A. V. (2006). Diahnostyka zdibnostey do suspilstva [Diagnosis of the ability to communicate]. SPb. : Pyter, 2006. 176 [in Russian].
Batsevych F. S. (2002). Terminolohiya komunikatyvnoyi linhvistyky: aspekty dyskursyvnoho pidkhodu [Terminology of communicative linguistics: aspects of the discursive approach]. Visnyk nats. un-tu «Lvivska politekhnika». 2002. 12–19 [in Ukrainian].
Byrkenbyl V. F. (2002). Komunikatsiynyy treninh: nauka suspilstva dlya vsikh; per. s nem. N. Chupeeva [Communication training: the science of communication for all]. M.: FAYR-PRESS, 2002. 352 [in Russian].
Pocheptsov H. H. (2001). Teoryya kommunykatsyy [Theory of communication]. M.: Refl-buk; K. : Vakler, 2001. 256 [in Ukrainian].
Semenyuk O. A., Parashchuk V. YU. (2010). Osnovy teoriyi movnoyi komunikatsiyi: navch. posibnyk [Fundamentals of the theory of speech communication]. K.: VTS «Akademiya», 2010. 240 [in Ukrainian].
Chorniy V. YA. (2011). Formuvannya hotovnosti do profesiynoho spilkuvannya maybutnikh fakhivtsiv finansovo-ekonomichnoyi sfery: dys. … kand. ped. nauk: 13.00.04 [Formation of readiness for professional communication of future specialists of financial and economic sphere]. Ternopil, 2011. 324 [in Ukrainian].
Abstract views: 220 PDF Downloads: 171
